|
|||
Contrary to Regardless, the entire concept is flawed. Iron Chef worked because of the transplant of Samurai ethic; it was intended to be Samurai duels with pots and pans. They borrowed all the trappings of martial arts, including "schools" and rivalries and supposed grudges; it worked because it was quintessentially Japanese. (One of the fascinating story lines they kept following was of traditional Japanese chefs challenging Morimoto because he was too radical, not to mention because he was living in New York. He kept beating them, but then Morimoto is truly a master, as are they all.) It hit all the right notes, being ludicrous in the extreme in some regards while being completely fascinating in other ways. And the cooking is always, always, absolutely top notch. That's the key. Everything else is over the top, but the cooking saves it all -- and must, because at least two of the panel members, and sometimes all four, are gourmets. None of that translates to America. We don't have the samurai ethic here; and I fear it would come off instead like some sort of game show -- which would crush the seriousness of the food and remove the one thing that makes the show work. From the sound of it they missed out on having any actual food experts on the panel and went completely with show business "personalities" (and lousy ones, at that). And then there's Shatner, a very poor trade for Chairman Kaga. I certainly have no intention whatever of watching Iron Chef USA; let's let it die of poor ratings. (discuss) |