Stardate 20010702.1346 (On Screen): This is the latest in a series of articles I've seen denouncing the use of "pop-under" advertisements by a certain company. What I don't quite understand is why it is that all these pundits are giving the company they claim to hate so much free press? As has sometimes been said, there's no such thing as negative publicity (not quite true, but damned near) and every one of these denunciations has contained the name of the company and a description of its product. Who's side are you on, anyway?
(discuss)
